🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' childhood". A law could be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to block their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. Even though it warns of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid foundation," said the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are safe and fit for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is largely happening at the state government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Beyond Europe and the US, further states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations take a more measured position. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this global discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and others demonstrate that governments internationally are less and less prepared to wait for platforms to self-regulate.